The Economist highlights the importance of improving the way aid is given:
Because the aid they receive is such a capricious, volatile commodity, governments dare not make full use of it. They could hire legions of extra teachers, clinicians and civil servants, but only if they are prepared to fire them when the aid spigot is closed. They could put AIDS-sufferers on anti-retroviral therapies, but only if they are willing to discontinue treatment once the money stops.
The article explains why the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness is such an important step towards reducing the costs of aid to beneficiaries and donors alike, and so greatly improving the effectiveness with which aid is used.
It is a rare pleasure to read this well-informed comment about the need for donors to align their aid with the systems they are trying to support, to make aid more predictable, less likely to undermined domestic accountability and to duplicate each other less.
One response to “The Economist on improving the quality of aid”
Donor coordination…
There have been numerous discussions recently on the need (or lack thereof) of more aid for developing countries. An article in the Economist reminds us that the quality of aid is as important as its quantity. After the Indian Ocean tsunami, acco…